SCOTTISH RUGBY Chief Executive Mark Dodson gave his now customary eve of Six Nations press briefing yesterday and here are the main points from his chat with the fourth estate.
1. It is time for Scotland to challenge for the Six Nations title.
“If you ask Gregor, and I think he said so at his press conference yesterday [Wednesday], he goes into these tournaments looking to win.
“The squad depth is the greatest in my time here, and I’ve heard other respected commentators and even some of you [journalists] say that this is the strongest squad in depth terms we’ve been able to put on the park in a generation, so our expectations are high.”
2. The pro teams are 12 to 18 months away from being at the level he wants.
“I think Edinburgh and Glasgow are pretty competitive. If you look at the URC, Edinburgh are top and Glasgow are fourth.
“Edinburgh are playing a fine brand of rugby now and going well in the Challenge Cup, and I think Glasgow had a very tough Champions Cup draw against La Rochelle, finalists in the Top 14 and Europe last year, and Exeter, who have been in the same position.
“So, we [Glasgow] didn’t have an easy group at all, but we came up short and we have to accept that we are not there yet. We are a season to 18 months away from being a side who can expect to reach the second round of the European Cup.
“That’s how I judge a competitive side – as a side who are competing in the URC play-offs every year and are also getting through to the second round of Europe. I think beyond the second round it becomes a bit of a lottery in terms of form and other teams playing well.
“We need to be regularly demonstrating like the Irish sides that we can reach the second round of Europe.”
3. The £15m grant and £5m loan received from the Scottish Government to support the game through the Covid crisis has been properly handled.
“It will be very clear in our reporting to government around the funding, which we have an obligation to do.
“It is very clear that the £15m as a grant was to go to repairing the balance sheet from the damage which was caused by not having any income from the  Six Nations beyond. The £5m, we have been very clear, is going at £1m per year to the clubs directly through the growth and participation fund, and I think in two or three weeks’ time we are going to be opening that process so clubs can apply for the £1m on offer this year. We’ve already directed unprecedented levels of investment into the grassroots game.
“And the £15m retained by the Union was never to be transferred into Glasgow and Edinburgh. Our policy with Glasgow and Edinburgh is to go from where we had to with our pro team budgets [during Covid] and get back to normal, with a focus of making sure that we have stronger and deeper squads and you can, hopefully, see that with some of our recruitment.
“All the best talent we have in Scotland is being tied down unto long-term contracts and continuing to be announced almost on a daily basis.”
Rhys Tait to captain Scotland Under-20s during Six Nations
Mesu Kunavula extends Edinburgh contract
4. Grassroots player numbers is a major concern – locally and globally.
“I think it is too early to say exactly where it sits at the moment.
“Playing numbers have been a problem for us since pre-Covid and they will be a problem for us post-Covid. When you look at the programmes that we’ve put in place like ‘Everyone’s Game’ you will notice that we are working really hard at schools and club level to attract people back to the game, and also to keep people in the game once they’ve retired in either a coaching capacity or from a volunteer perspective.
“Retention and participation is a huge part of the Rugby Development department’s world, especially in the post-Covid era. We are going to spend a lot of money and resource making sure that we actually retain our numbers.
“But it is a global problem for us and other nations. We are going to work extremely hard on it but I am not going to make any promises that ‘we will be fine, don’t worry’. I think we would be mistaken to think that player numbers have not been affected by corona.”
5. Next month’s World Cup qualifying match could be a pivotal moment for the women’s game in this country.
“It is important that we underpin the progress the squad has made. It would be a fantastic boost for the game across Scotland and the women’s game in particular to get to the World Cup. The team and the squad all understand the importance of this game and I think we should be quietly confident about our prospects.
“There are several stepping stones in the women’s game that don’t exist. We have to put those in place. One is a professional team where our players can play and another one is regional training centres and development of the leagues in more depth. Those are being addressed in the overall women’s strategy that Gemma Fay is leading on.
“We are already in conversation with the RFU about looking at another pro team in their professional setup. A new franchise round will take place in 2022-23 and we’ve already opened conversations and I’ve spoken with Bill Sweeney my opposite number at the RFU about getting involved.”
6. He quite fancies carrying on in the job after his current contract runs out at the end of the 2023 World Cup
“I haven’t really had any conversations with the Board about that. As far as those conversations will take place, there’s always a planned way through the nominations committee and through the Board and I’ll speak to people about that nearer the time. The same is applicable to our coaches in the usual cycle.
“This job is the greatest job in the world for 320 days of the year. For those other days, it’s a bit more difficult. I enjoy this job and while I continue to do it, I’ll do the very best I can. I don’t please everybody all the time as you probably realise, but I enjoy the job.”
Season Appeal 2022 - 2023
We hope you are enjoying our unrivalled coverage of Scottish Rugby. While mainstream media continues to reduce its interest in the rugby family in Scotland, The Offside Line does its very best to make sure all levels of the domestic game are reported.
Our commitment to the game and sharing its stories means that we do not have a paywall, so we would ask you (only if you can!) to support The Offside Line, either with a one off donation, or with a monthly contribution.
We have been keeping Scottish rugby in the news since 2016 and will have 3 million page views this year, making The Offside Line first for Scottish rugby.
7. The national stadium is going to need big cash spent on it in the not-so-distant future.
“Murrayfield has a shelf life and we are going to have to address that at some point but you can imagine that is a big capital investment issue if taken singularly.”
8. He still wants to expand Super6 but that’s not going to happen before the league’s next block kicks off in late Spring.
“You won’t be surprised to hear that I’m still bullish about it. I think the tournament itself has proved itself to be a far higher standard of rugby than we had previously. The general acceptance of the quality of the product and the coverage we’ve been able to give in broadcast has been significant.
“As you know we’ve been talking to London Scottish about the potential of them coming into a Super8. They’re having conversations with the RFU which will take time and they probably won’t join the Super8 or Super7 in the short term. But when the Six Nations finishes we’ll be starting to focus on expanding the league to certainly a Super7 and we’ll be talking about that nearer the time. There are places in the country where there is a gap for having a Super7 team and we’ll be talking about that after the Six Nations.
9. The challenges facing rugby in the North East of Scotland need to be addressed as a matter of urgency.
“Aberdeen has been in trouble for a while in terms of an area, and we’ve talked long and hard with people like [Aberdeen Grammar Chairman] Gordon Thomson, who is on our Council, and to stakeholders in Aberdeen on what we can do there.
“I’m sure it’s an area that will come under discussion [with regard to Super6]. There’s also the Glasgow area, the Midlands around Dundee, we need to look at these things and regardless of where the next franchise is, we’re going to have to look at Aberdeen from a rugby development point of view. It’s a mixture of economics, playing numbers and facilities that causes the problems.”
10. A third pro team is still the vision but not any time soon.
“I think Jim Mallinder said this when he came in [as director of performance rugby] that to be competitive we do need a third pro team. But there is a lot of complexity to that around where we play, access into the URC and the finances over a multi-year period that would allow that third team to thrive.
“All those things at the moment, post-Covid, are problematic. But in principle, from a strategic point of view, it is something we would strive towards. I think we are creating enough players from our pipelines in Scotland and our SQ program that would allow that to take place.
“What we’ve got to do is make sure that our current pro teams are competitive and at the top of the game first before we move on to that third notion.
“I think it would be one for the next strategy after the one we have through until 2024. I would look at this as being something for between 2025 and 2030 to look at properly, unless an opportunity came up in the meantime.
“We have looked at the economics of the professional game in England and France. Everyone would welcome the ability to play a third pro team but I have to make sure we keep the game in Scotland safe and secure. We’ve done a huge amount of work to underpin the game for the next generation in Scotland in terms of where our cash position sits and overall how our finances are now very robust. I don’t want to put that into jeopardy.
“We’re in a situation where we’re really concentrating on those two [existing pro teams] and making sure economically, we’re in the right place. The Dam Health Stadium has been massive for Edinburgh and we’re going to try to improve our status at Scotstoun as well, improving that stadium in terms of capacity. I don’t wish to be drawn too much into a third franchise conversation because the focus, certainly until the end of this period, is the two teams.
“We looked at Worcester in the past, we looked at Newcastle. There’s two things in that; using the club as a vehicle where we could play our growing number of players, and second was the intelligence you can get about what the economics are. Our experience of French rugby in Nice, in America [with Old Glory], and our experience of working and talking to people we know in the English game have been invaluable in understanding the economics and applying them to our own position in Scotland.
“The ownership structures in England appear to be quite settled at the moment as they go through their own post-Covid environments. I imagine there might be opportunities in a couple of years’ time as they stabilise themselves post-Covid, but just now I don’t see an opportunity down there.”
Mr Dodson has done a tremendous job. Scottish Rugby continues to grow under his leadership. You get what you pay for and he has stuck with the job. I suspect that he could earn a lot more in the corporate world.
Ha ha brilliant! Are you Boris Johnson?
Murrayfield has needed upgrading for years. I went to the Aviva to watch Edinburgh in the semi final of the cup and could not believe how much better the experience was than a trip to Murrayfield. A lift to our seat level where there was a choice of hot or cold food, drinks and clean modern toilets and modern hand washing facilities. In this department in the ladies at least at Murrayfield it is a disgrace.
Scottish Rugby is financially in a hugely better state under his guidance crowds are up Super 6 is beginning to draw crowds and is broadcast. I wish the old style lets go back to a time before professionalism folks would realise we live in a professional era where pro teams need cash and grass roots in all sports will be very tough largely due to computer games. So lets give the guy credit for a job largely well done.
Wondering what point 7 means in reality?
Can you investigate more about the Scotstoun expansion/improvement plans he mentions?
We seemed close to being able to see the project plans in 2020 (Nathan Bombrys interviews, up to 12000 capacity mentioned. Most seats through new North Stand) but then COVID hit. We’ve not really heard any mention of Scotstoun’s future until this interview here.
Item 3 looks particularly damning. I invite readers to consider the following….
Despite protestations to the contrary, his administration’s failure to properly apply and to account for (according to evidence on hand) the Scottish Government’s extraordinary £20 million Covid bailout will catch up with him before much longer.
The denouement may arrive even before we close the circle and obtain confirmation through legal sources that the Union’s original claim for exceptional financial support was likely to have been “embellished”, over-egged or actually falsified. Least anyone should forget, at that time, the SRU was nearing the buffers of practical financial insolvency due to mismanagement, rather than the impact of the pandemic.
Towards the end of 2020, the Union had been unable to pay all its bills as they arose, with the bank refusing to extend its line of credit and in consequence the auditors refusing to sign off the YE 2021 Acoounts on the crucially important “going concern basis”…
Moreover, according to all the documentation and surrounding correspondence, the evidence is clear that the Scottish Government’s financial support was given to support “rugby clubs across Scotland” (quoted from the Offer of grant), subject to certain conditions including submission of formal monthly reports and final comprehensive report, which we know from FOI responses have NEVER been provided.
It is hardly surprising that the SRU has avoided clarity / transparency in all of this, finding itself in breach of the conditions attaching to the financial aid, given only 10% of the £15 million Grant (£1.5 million) has been allocated to funds to which clubs are sought to make highly detailed, complex and time-consuming applications (at a time when hard-pressed officials are struggling to keep the doors open, etc.).
In reality, not much of even 10% of the grant will have found its way into the hands of the clubs, the Scottish Government’s intended recipients. The real icing on the cake is that NONE of the £5 million zero-interest loan has yet been put up for applications by clubs, in 5 equal annual tranches.
So – of the SG’s £20 million emergency funding to “support rugby clubs across Scotland”, at the very most, £1.5 million could have gone to those afore-mentioned clubs! Where, you might ask, is the rest of the Scottish taxpayers’ hard-earned dosh? That sits comfortably within the SRU’s own financial reserves….. The ever-slippery Mr Dodson might even describe that as “repairing the balance sheet”.
If it weren’t true, you couldn’t make this stuff up.
Hmmm so mini and midi numbers are up and adult numbers are down, maybe if the SRU need to provide more investment at club level in facilities, facilities,facilities and coaching.coaching coaching then maybe teens might stay on as adults. Maybe a change at some University/colleges too, perhaps some of them would be better suited partnering with clubs helping retain numbers and possibly capturing some who hadn’t considered rugby to date. I dunno maybe that’s all nonsense or done already and I’m just 20 years out of date.
Scotland has hit a purple patch with Hogg, Finnish, Duran, just now. JG seems to be on the wane……I know not why ! But I don’t see the future Hogg, Finns, JGS being talked up like they were when Glasgow won the Pro12…..maybe we are missing that Fiji flair !Just passing comment…..Dodson doesn’t need any contract extension…..overpaid, overhyped
A lot of fluff and very little substance. I would agree with Dom Ward. The grass roots player numbers are a matter of statistical data and it is not “too early to say”. Rugby in Scotland is losing people hand over fist to many different factors. Covid has had an impact but that’s not the main cause.
Lack of investment over the years, bad management, and the ego to believe that rugby was at the forefront of most peoples minds when it comes to the sport that their kids will play has a lot to do with it. Not to mention the underperformance of the national team over the last 20 years.
We missed the boat completely on the professional game. That was the start of it. It has not got much better since.
Let me help Mark Dodson on his 4th strategic concern . I am
pleased he is worried about only 13,413 male adults playing rugby in Scotland ( SRU annual report 2019-20 ) Who knows what It will have dropped to now with the pandemic – evidence number of club games cancelled this season which
I don’t believe it’s all down to the pandemic.
We have had a huge growth in mini rugby over
the past 10 years . Why can’t we retain this growth
through and post secondary school ages ?
Part of the reason is the game is becoming more
dangerous, less attractive and less participative
We need Dodson and the SRU to put pressure
on World Rugby to reduce the number of subs on
the bench , drop the tackle height , penalise
double tackles and no ball take outs around ruck and
maul and monitor the offside line properly .
Let’s get the game back for players of all
shapes and sizes with an emphasis on
running for space not collision
Good article, thanks.
Rugby stuff aside, I love big stadiums and have been fortunate enough to visit several in North America as well as Europe over the years (Cowboys stadium is amazing, SoFi is next on the list!). Given the size of the land and it’s existing brand. I really think we have a chance to do something special at Murrayfield that, if the economics are done right, will pay for itself and then some over the years to come. With an increased capacity, it can be both highly commercial whilst retaining enough reasonably-priced tickets for your average fan. Stadiums have moved on remarkably since twickenham, dublin, the Stade and the millennium were re-built. Do it right, make the stadium famous across Europe (not just in rugby-playing nations), and we can put ourselves at a significant commercial advantage compared to our peers for once.
Is that typed in some form of Enigma Code?
Despite not publishing reliable stats on playing numbers, nearly all of us know grassroots playing numbers have been an for a long time.
We need positive moves on community coaches in schools, a shift to better weather rugby and solutions that meet the needs of individual Clubs (not national initiatives that look good to funding bodies andd governement agencies).
Trying to please more people might be a more effective strategy, as difficult as that may be.
It’s illuminating to know that our ventures in France and the US are tests of economics.
The rhetoric from Murrayfield in player numbers is worrying. How can it be “too early to say where we sit at the moment”? The data issued for the season structure work says less than 10k senior male players and I think there is considerable double counting going on there. The clue is in the number of games postponed through lack of players.
Would be lovely to learn more about the player and volunteer attraction and retention strategy. As a mere club person I’ve seen nothing except a few social media posts.
Wise words from Mr Dodson and its good to hear he has no plans to be going anywhere. As he says he isn’t going to please everyone but in comparison with much of the professional era,scottish rugby is in a good place under his stewardship.
Why would he go anywhere else? Where else could he earn the fortune he does for under achieving?
Absolutely!!North. Berwick ??