A MEETING of Premiership and National One clubs [including the Super 6 license-holders] agreed last night that the ‘playing down’ of Super 6 players should not be allowed. The decision was reached after a lengthy discussion and apparently must now be ratified by the Board. A couple of Super 6 clubs argued vehemently in favour of allowing Super 6 players to turn out for club teams in the national league framework but were heavily outnumbered in the end.
A lack of clarity on this issue was one of the major bones of contention at last Friday night’s stormy Special General Meeting of the Scottish Rugby Union which was held to decide where the ‘Clubs XVs’ of Super 6 teams should play in the national league structure from next season onwards. The motion put forward by the SRU Council carried in the end, meaning that these sides will be removed from the top tier Premiership and placed in the league below (National One), but a number of delegates expressed their dissatisfaction before the vote that they were having to make a big decision without having access to all the relevant facts.
“I am disappointed that we are being asked to vote on where we are placing teams without knowing what players are going to be in those teams,” said Ross Whiteside, President of Hamilton Rugby Club, just before the motion was voted on. “I think that is a relevant point going forward, there has been plenty of time – a year and a half of discussion – and yet we still don’t know the protocols for the interacting between teams and Super 6 clubs to get players to and from them. I think that is a major problem when it comes to making a decision on this but unfortunately we are going to have to support the motion.”
An amendment to the motion from GHA aimed at providing clarity on this issue was rejected four days before the meeting by SRU General Counsel Robert Howat on the grounds of relevancy.
It is bizarre that this issue appears to have been sorted out so easily and relatively amicably, just five days after it created a huge amount of ill-feeling towards the SRU (and by extension Super 6 clubs) at the SGM, and it reinforces the impression that the whole process of launching Super 6 could have run far more smoothly with a bit more forethought and empathy shown towards the clubs not involved.
The decision not to allow ‘playing down’ is in line with point 6.1.2 of the ‘Super 6 Tournament – Franchise Information’ which was issued in November 2017. It stated that: “During the period of their contract Super 6 players will play fixtures only as directed by the head coach. They will not play in any fixture in which amateur players are engaged. Penalties for breaching this regulation may be substantial for both head coach and player.”
This does, however, create a potential issue of contracted players struggling to get regular game time if they are not being selected for their Super 6 team.