Cattigan family direct a forceful reminder at Scottish Rugby

Failure to meet or openly address issue is "an insult to her memory and heartbreakingly painful"

Siobhan Cattigan wad capped 19 times by Scotland. Image: © Craig Watson -
Siobhan Cattigan wad capped 19 times by Scotland. Image: © Craig Watson -

THE parents of Siobhan Cattigan have issued a forceful reminder that their anger and desire for answers from Scottish Rugby on its role in their daughter’s death in November 2021 is as fierce as it was when they first raised concerns back in July of last year.

The grieving couple issued a blistering statement on social media this morning in which they accused the governing body, and specifically chief executive Mark Dodson, of dishonouring the former Scotland back-row forward’s memory by twice cancelling meetings with Sue Webber, the Conservative MSP who has taken up the case on their behalf.

“We were hopeful questions could be posed, answers provided and arrangements for an independent inquiry that is so desperately needed be set in motion,” said the statement.

‘For want of a kicking tee, a game was lost’: Orkney push West of Scotland all the way

2022-23 Premiership Leaderboard – after 17ish rounds

Premiership Final: Stirling County defeat Corstorphine Cougars with strong second half performance

“After hearing the second meeting had been cancelled at short notice, we were devastated. Could he not find an hour in his schedule in over two months to discuss what we firmly believe to be a totally avoidable tragedy and what no-one should want to become a stain on Scottish Rugby?”

An SRU spokesman said that Dodson is now looking for a suitable alternative date in the next two weeks.

The Cattigans have previously argued that a lack of proper treatment for brain injuries sustained whilst playing or training in the Scotland squad led to their daughter’s death, aged just 26.

It has been reported that the family have joined a lawsuit alleging that rugby authorities could have done more to prevent the brain damage suffered by many players.

In this most recent statement, they reissued their request for Scottish Rugby to commission an independent inquiry into the tragedy, and reiterated their view that their daughter’s death has not yet been appropriately commemorated by the governing body.

This latest development comes just days after the women’s team at Liberton rugby club in Edinburgh was disbanded amid accusations of “misogynistic, racist and homophobic comments and behaviour” by the club’s committee, and the statement makes reference to this.

“Sexism, bullying and intimidation are most definitely not confined to local rugby clubs,” it asserted. “It happens at elite levels and Scottish Rugby chief executive Mark Dodson and others at the top of the game can lead the way if they want to by doing the right thing for the right reasons, a start would be by allowing an independent inquiry to take place.

“Continuing to ignore us and an MSP is dishonouring Siobhan’s memory. She gave almost five years of her life playing for Scotland. She mattered and she still does. She deserves to be remembered and revered. She deserves to be honoured.”

“The SRU had months before any intimation of legal action yet refused to acknowledge, far less honour her in this time but they continue to deflect, deny and refuse to engage. Is the idea to kick the can down the road until those at the top are long gone? If they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear from an inquiry. Let’s make Siobhan’s legacy a safer future for all rugby playing women, its what she lived doing, helping others.

“It is our emphatic belief that if Siobhan was a male member of the Scottish Rugby team, she would have received the proper medical care and attention which she should have been guaranteed.

“It is inconceivable that Scottish Rugby would not mark the passing of a current international, and it is not too late to honour her. Recognition of her life and contribution before one of the Six Nations games is the least they can do.

“Siobhan always has and always will make us the proudest parents, our champion and hero, and that we have to plead for her to be acknowledged is an insult to her memory and heartbreakingly painful for us.”


Scottish Rugby have so far resisted all calls for an independent inquiry, with Dodson claiming after last August’s AGM that: “There are a number of people looking at a number of things at the moment. It is not a review. It will try and establish the facts. That is what we are trying to do. Facts and timeline.

“This may end up in court proceedings and this may be the most appropriate place for this to end up.”

This fact-finding mission is apparently on-going, with the help of external legal advice. A cynic might describe this as preparing a legal defence.

Certainly, there has been no progress report since the AGM, which, along with Dodson’s double-cancellation of his scheduled meeting with Webber, strongly suggests that properly addressing the issues raised is not a burning priority.

Meanwhile, Lorne Crerar – who is Chair of the ‘Custodian Board’ which now sits at the summit of Scottish Rugby’s new governance structure and which is responsible for oversight of all aspects of the organisation – said shortly before taking office in October that he expected this issue to be high on his list of priorities.

“Clearly anything that has a significant effect on the brand of Scottish Rugby will have an influence on the Custodians’ views, and clearly this is a matter of considerable public interest,” he said. “It will certainly be part of one of the initial agendas of the Custodian Board.”

One thing is for sure, the Cattigans are not going to let this matter be swept quietly under the carpet.

Parents of Siobhan Cattigan say lack of proper care led to her death

About David Barnes 3957 Articles
David has worked as a freelance rugby journalist since 2004 covering every level of the game in Scotland for publications including The Herald/Sunday Herald, The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The Scotsman/Scotland on Sunday/Evening News, The Daily Record, The Daily Mail/Mail on Sunday and The Sun.


  1. Understandably bereft parents and social media are one of the worst mixes in modern society. Of course they feel like this and absolutely deserve our sympathy, but there has been acknowledgement via minutes silence. They want more, of course they do, I would too, but realistically…..
    With legal action looking how can SRU engage? As for their actions being viewed as preparing a defence, what’s the option? Throw staff under the bus without us process?

  2. Drawing battle lines and then expecting the other side to attend a sit-down with your political sponsor is a tad unrealistic. This is going nowhere.

    • Perhaps if the SRU had behaved in a proper way in the first place battle lines would not have been drawn up. But that is a lot to ask with the current CEO in place.

      Someone has died here and the SRU seem to have been totally disinterested from the very beginning. Shameful.

      • Dodson will do as he’s advised. The criticism is now for criticism’s sake by people who dont know him. Nobody fully knows the Union’s view because they’ve been penned into a corner and realise every word will be seized upon. So far we seem to have opinions presented as fact by one side. That does not create an environment for dialogue. Cheering on people who are naturally upset is to be cautioned against.

      • Supporting people who are naturally upset is the decent thing to do. Creating a strawman argument as you have helps no one.

  3. I’m afraid expecting Mr Dodson to behave in a decent and honourable way is pointless. How much longer will he be paid a fortune to discredit the Scottish game?

  4. Given that the threat of legal action was mooted a while back, I would have thought that the SRU stance of not publicly making comments was sensible – especially through the circus of social media

  5. Time for the Custodian Board to hold procrastinating Dodson’s feet to the fire. He should run the day an independent review was refused.

    • There was a minute’s silence at both Edinburgh and Glasgow games and there wasn’t a Scotland mens game for months anyway. Tom Smith didn’t get a minutes silence at any international but he did at the next Edinburgh match. It’s just how rugby works, not a disrespect at all.

    • Bandwagoneer Crerar will undoubtedly seek not to lose the slightest opportunity to enhance his profile.

      • I don’t know about a Band-wagon but I did get a distinct feeling of depression at his comment ” the brand of Scottish Rugby ” and there was me thinking it was a Sport. Another vacuous description to go along with “Community Rugby’ instead of Amateur.


Comments are closed.