10 tough questions for the SRU’s Vice-Presidential candidates

Hazel Swankie and Keith Wallace give their thoughts on some of the big issues facing Scottish Rugby at the moment

Clubs will vote for either Hazel Swankie and Keith Wallace as Vice-President of the Scottish Rugby Union at next Saturday's AGM.
Clubs will vote for either Hazel Swankie and Keith Wallace as Vice-President of the Scottish Rugby Union at next Saturday's AGM.

HAZEL SWANKIE of Dunfermline RFC (read CV here) and Keith Wallace of Haddington RFC (read CV here) are the two candidates to become the next Vice-President of the Scottish Rugby Union, with clubs set to vote for their favoured choice at next Saturday’s AGM. The Offside Line posed the pair 10 tricky questions and this is how they responded.

1. What inspired you to stand for this position?

HS: “My passion for the game – being involved with club rugby for 26 years as a volunteer, from fundraising to fixtures secretary to club secretary, then club president – I understand the challenges clubs face on a daily basis. Believe me, I’ve shared the pain of trying to remain sustainable and financially viable whilst at the same time making sure coaches and volunteers have what they need and players are thriving. I want to be part of club rugby flourishing in the coming years, there are some great programmes out there which will deliver long term results for our game and player numbers, particularly within the state school sector – we need to get these out there into clubland, develop and promote them, and ensure a pipeline of more to come. We mustn’t rest!”

KW: “Our great game stands at a crossroads: the overwhelming support for the SCOG Governance proposals gives us all a great opportunity to work together and build a better way forward.

“With over 50 years of playing and 40 years of administering in the club game, coupled with serving on 10 Boards, three as chair, I am inspired to combine two of my great passions, rugby and governance, to seize this opportunity to support Colin Rigby as the incoming President in delivering the change agenda initiated by Ian Barr.

“I commit to bring all my passion, knowledge, honesty, integrity, selflessness and experience to represent the Clubs for the good of the game,  and I am happy to be judged on this.”

2. What do you hope will be your biggest achievement during your four year in office (as Vice-President then President) if elected?

HS: “Playing a part in the introduction of the new Governance structure and as Chair of the new Club Rugby Board, seeing it become established as the central, club-orientated vehicle for the development of the domestic game, would be a massive achievement and honour. I believe it – the CRB – can really be positioned to work effectively with our Rugby Development Department to address the issues of ‘Player Pathways’, to see a renewed focus on club-orientated 7s and to carry out a review about how we might better help clubs implement capital investment development projects.

KW: “I would hope to achieve three interlinked things:

  • Promote the mutual dependency between the professional game bringing in the revenue, and the club game which introduces players to the game: the essence of the Union.

  • Lead the set-up of the Club Rugby Board (CRB) establishing rigour in the key board areas of strategy, scrutiny and advocacy.

  • Grow the game from the bottom up.”

3. How strong is the Union right now?

HS: “I believe the Union is strong and has weathered the Covid crisis in better shape than some other Unions, through tight fiscal control, liaison and funding from the Scottish Government, and the army of exceptional volunteers that run our Clubs. I believe the Union will be even stronger post the SCOG proposal being implemented as we can look forward to Scottish Rugby working as one, with proper and effective oversight, scrutiny and transparency finally in place, all key values we – as member clubs and the ultimate owners of Scottish Rugby – have a right to expect.”

KW: “A friend and colleague, wise and knowledgeable in sports management, said “the role of a sports governing body is threefold: participation, performance and bringing the members with you.

I think that there is room for improvement in all three areas, and huge scope to do so if we all work together.  As clubs I want to see us compete on the field and collaborate off it.”

That was the month that was: July 2022

Jim Mallinder, John Fletcher and Kenny Murray discuss performance department priorities

New governance structure proposals for SRU approved with big majority

4. What is the single most critical challenge currently facing Scottish Rugby?

HS: “If you’re asking me for just one, it would have to be the drop off in adult male players throughout the game – but Scottish Rugby is not alone with this challenge. There are many other sports/interests we have to compete against to retain and recruit players. We need to consider how we make it easier for people to remain in the game and commit to a season of rugby. There will be many reading this now who have ideas or solutions to this challenge and as your new Vice President I would welcome dialogue. Would it be evening games during the week? Or perhaps exploring all weather floodlit facilities located strategically to allow multiple teams access and fulfilment of fixtures? There is no ‘daft’ answer as this is a collective problem – one we need to and can only solve together.”

KW: “The need to avoid short term fixes and instead back ourselves to take a long term view in developing strategies on participation and performance, growing the number of players and officials from the bottom up by selling the fun and enjoyment of the game.”

5. Does the proposed new governance structure strike the right balance between protecting club interests and letting the business people do their job?

HS: “In a word, yes. I believe so. It’s designed on the one hand to provide clubs with greater influence and control of the club game, how it might develop and prosper. On the other hand, it empowers our executive to focus on developing revenue streams, the pro game and on managing our estate and all the hard working Union employees. Additionally, it re-establishes the importance of the clubs as the owners of the Scottish Rugby Union. And I believe that is a good thing, though it also brings with it a responsibility that must be exercised by us all.”

KW: “I think the proposed new governance structure is excellent. After many false starts it has been worth waiting for.

“The clubs interests will be looked after much more actively by the new Company Limited by Guarantee (CLG), and by CRB where the clubs will have far more say and transparency on how funding is spent on them.  I expect to see clubs involved in forming CRB strategy and many club members directly involved in CRB working groups, finding a real appetite for this in my discussions with clubs.

The business people (executives) will have much more clarity of responsibility and accountability, once strategy and budget is agreed with CLG, allowing them to get on with their jobs.”

6. Developing the women’s game is a key objective for Scottish Rugby – how is it going?

HS: “This is an area of development, with the Women’s and Girl’s four year strategy recently announced and the increase in funding into the game. The new league structure for Season 22-23 will drive to enhance quality and playing opportunities for all participants. This is statistically the fastest growing part of our game. However, we must recognise that as popularity of the sport rises we have challenges to ensure the infrastructure and the people that make rugby happen have the capacities and capabilities to embrace the demand.”

KW: “I think we have been a bit slow, compared with say Ireland, where many clubs have been rescued by establishing women’s teams.

However, we are now on an upward trajectory. In particular it has been pleasing in my discussions with clubs how many smaller clubs have succeeded in getting women’s teams established, seeing real benefits.

Since games played is the only true indicator of the health of the game, there are obvious benefits in striving to grow the women’s game.”


7. What is your assessment of the development pathway in Scottish Rugby at the moment – and how can we improve it?

HS: “I know for many this is a contentious topic. The pathway does not seem to be working for everyone. The poor performance of the U20’s over the past two years has highlighted the problem. But I believe that progress will come with the high-calibre of folk finally now in post. But they can’t do that from a desk in Murrayfield and I’d wish to promote a series of meetings/engagements with key stakeholders from clubs on this matter. Clubs are very often at the coalface of elite, young player development but, if we’re being honest, there are too many stories of the input they have to offer being ignored. That’s got to change. I believe it can and if elected, will do everything I can to bring about a wholesale cultural change in this area.”

KW: “This has emerged as a hot topic in the hustings, coinciding with the U20s results.  It is the key linkage between the club and professional games.

I think we can make many improvements, including:

  1. Casting the net wider and more often, to help find the hidden gems/late developers.

  2. Ensuring pathway players get more/enough game time.

  3. Reducing the numbers of Non-Scottish Qualified players, other than a few marquee players at Edinburgh and Glasgow as role models (thus avoiding poor investment and blockage to many).

  4. Having open and supportive discussions with player/parents, club/school and pathways management on each player, to agree the best options.

  5. Ensuring that pathways are just as open and supportive on the way back down. Not all players will make it but as a governing body we have a duty of care to these players, and also a fiduciary duty to get the best ongoing return on our investment. We need to see how they are best retained in the game as players (at a lower level), coaches or referees etc. Too many are simply lost to the game.

8. Does World Rugby represent the best interests of the Scottish game?

HS: “I’ll be honest and say, at the moment, I don’t think I’m a person qualified to answer this question. I could give you a ‘fluffy’ politically correct answer if my arm Is twisted. But, if I have to answer, let’s just put it this way, I’m unaware of any disadvantage Scotland suffers through the actions of World Rugby.”

KW: “Generally yes, notwithstanding the recent disappointing loss of the Sevens. I would however like to see greater focus on three things:

  • Player safety, particularly at the highest levels. The ability to replace six of your starting pack, for example, is not helping.
  • Considering whether there is a need for different laws for the amateur and professional game: eg some of the changes to the scrum rules were entirely due to the sheer forces at the top level (partly caused by replacements noted above) and were not needed at club level.
  • Promoting the game’s values.

9. What has been the most useful takeaway from the various hustings meetings you have attended?

HS: “I was always aware that there’s a huge amount of dedicated, enthusiastic volunteers in clubland and I can honestly say that meeting so many during the hustings has been my pleasure. Sure, I won’t appeal to everyone voting for Vice President but I hope that as a result of those meetings, phone calls and emails, no-one can doubt my sincerity. I do not have a portfolio of directorships as a distraction, I’m 100 percent focussed on my family and my love for Scottish Rugby, at all levels.”

KW: “Having spoken directly to over 100 clubs, I have been blown away by the sheer commitment and energy of the army of volunteers in our club game and the range of great things they are doing, bringing fun and enjoyment to many through the values of our game.

If under CRB we can give all these volunteers improved: recognition; clarity and transparency; effectiveness and efficiency through collaboration, sharing best practice and simplification of rules, regulations and paperwork; and funding – and then unite them in a common purpose of growing the game and improving performance, we will unleash an enormous power.

In doing so we can make the game accessible, affordable and, most of all, enjoyable. Players and volunteers at all levels will come back next Saturday or Sunday if they’ve enjoyed this week’s experience.”

10. John Rutherford, Gregor Townsend or Finn Russell?

HS: “John Rutherford – an elegant, classy player who exuded confidence on the park. BUT being a Midlands girl, I’ve got to give Finn a special mention: just sometimes, something out of leftfield pays huge dividends, does it not??

KW: “As a ‘piano shifter’ I have always enjoyed watching these three great ‘piano players’. Their ability to scan what is in front of them and have time on the ball is way beyond my ken. At their very best with great players around them to bring into play.

Sorry John and Gregor, for me Finn at his best sees and executes a range of kicks and passes to orchestrate his backline, probably unsurpassed in the game.”

Super6: five-try win gets Ayrshire Bulls off to a flier against Heriot’s

About David Barnes 3268 Articles
David has worked as a freelance rugby journalist since 2004 covering every level of the game in Scotland for publications including he Herald/Sunday Herald, The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The Scotsman/Scotland on Sunday/Evening News, The Daily Record, The Daily Mail/Mail on Sunday and The Sun.


  1. In my usual ‘negative’ way I find it difficult to warm to Q&A sessions vetting applicants preferring to have a good look at the CV of the individuals in order to consider their accomplishments prior to going for the Post: a sort of [previous] actions speak louder than words, if you get my drift.
    I did question a couple of things, namely:-
    KW – 7.3
    That position counts for nothing in reality because the individuals that run the 2 professional clubs will point out that if there isn’t sufficient talent coming through then they have to import talent, it’s the lazy way and self defeating and as KW said it blocks they ‘pathway’ and any potential for development, however Money talks and if one or other of the clubs can’t utilise players available then they will pull in a have boots will travel player, SQ or not.
    HS – 8
    I’m sorry if any observer, supporter of the game can’t answer or doesn’t feel qualified to respond to that question: ‘unaware’! Sorry World Rugby or the founder of the Shelbourne [I’ll scratch your back] Club as I prefer to call them have just binned the Scottish 7’s team without it seems a by your leave, either that or the SRU in some form knew about it and did nothing a disgraceful situation if true.
    As for the URC Pro14 as was, even the good lord would be unable to move South Africa into the Northern Hemisphere, but the URC have, a body coincidentally a Taxi ride from the Shelbourne. That also looks mighty suspicious with consideration to the proposed World Club fiasco being proposed.
    KW – 8
    The second of the three bullet points, not a bad idea in part although many, myself included would be happier to see the ‘Bench’ player numbers much reduced and replacements ‘for injury only’ if possible without a resurgence of the ‘Bloodgate’ Dean Richards behaviour. I think it would do the game both amateur and professional a power of good, and save money and possibly allow for additional professional sides – a win win situation in my opinion.

    As regards question 6, fine if the money is spent on the amateur game and not squandered on the URC women’s professional league with all the incumbent costs that will inevitably drain the amateur Club game both Men’s and Women’s. As it stands women’s professional club or international are financial loss leaders and we can ill afford it, we shouldn’t rob Peter to pay Paula, and as I’ve said before that is a fiscal position not a misogynistic one before the usual suspects head for the keyboard.

    As a final thought whoever picks up the Mantle I hope they will not be led astray by those in situ and represent the amateur Clubs forcefully, the essential starting point for the next generation of Scottish International players: and recognise that the games the thing to promote and where best to invest the money productively that can be wasted in non productive areas, if, once again, you get my drift.

  2. I shall be voting for Keith. I know he has had huge experience playing rugby for Haddington first XV for over 30 years (for which he has shown great allegance considering he has lived in Falkirk for many years) .
    He has excellent knowledge of the club rugby scene and recognises how important it is to get youngsters to play (both for their school and club- not on the same weekend. He also agrees teams should get promoted or relegated if they win or loose no matter how other teams in their school or club gets on)We need as many players playing as possible.
    He is a highly qualified and professional Civil Engineer/Project manager who has a strong characterful presence and is exceptional at giving Burns Supper renditions and singing rugby songs!

  3. The answers given are all well and good and will hopefully produce good players and results in the long term.
    However I and many others like me are alarmed and disappointed about the results of Scotlands mens team.
    Our last World Cup was a disaster and performances have arguably been worse since then.
    It seems that,as long as we beat England then things are going well.

  4. One candidate is an SRU establishment time-server, the other an ambitious independent!

    Make your mind up….

  5. Will Hazel or Keith look at under resourced in Scottish rugby namely the Universities.
    They are hidden talents in all the Scottish universities that has been neglected for a number of years
    I urge the two candidates to look in to this and act on it is appropriate to do so
    I have been involved with the Edinburgh University RFC for forty years

    • Sorry Michael but you are way off beam here. The universities chose to remove themselves from club rugby and concentrate on BUSA. That’s not the fault of Scottish Rugby.

      How we retain and pick up Uni players post course is the key and we need to up out game there.

      • Michael is absolutely correct, and you have got that badly wrong, Clubfan / Dom.

        Even if the Scottish Universities teams do play competitively generally midweek outwith the SRU club system they have every right to expect support and encouragement from the national governing body, of which they are all members.

Comments are closed.